Monday, December 17, 2007

Five Year End Observations PT I: Includes the Feminized Church, Dating, the Status of Women, and the power of "How are You?"


I apologize for not updating as often I'd like the past two weeks, but I ran into the buzz saw of exams and assignments and a new job, which left little time for some of my other passions. :) I'll be updating three times a week again from here on out.


Year End Observations Part I:


i. I've noticed that I get more emails now than comments. It isn't good or bad, and I love responding to you all, but don't be afraid to drop a comment either. When you notice the comment section is empty, it doesn't mean the section is empty, if you get my drift. The reason I sometimes advocate comments is because I want to encourage you all to be as transparent as possible. Posting allows others to see what you feel, what you're going through, and encourages them to do the same. This is the type of community we all should be striving towards. We all struggle, we all hurt, and when we share our pains and joys with one another, we exist in the manner God intended for us, I think.


ii. I generally have more women readers than men. I've added things to appeal to more guys, but this idea of women being more religious oriented than men has existed for a very long time. As far back as the time of Abraham and the Torah. In the OT, it becomes pretty clear with any careful reading that women tend to be more 'religious-minded' than the men. Early this year I wrote quite extensively about the need for church to gear itself towards men. I still believe that, even more strongly than I did.


iii. There is a strong interest in the evangelical community about the status of women, and the role of women. Some traditionalists (Complimentarians)believe that the role of women is clear and limited. Biblically, they're wrong, and yet they continue to receive strong support, espcially from other women. I heard one woman say on a radio show (Focus on the Family) that her role was "ducking" so that the Holy Spirit could speak to her husband. They ran marriage seminars. I can't think of anything more disturbing than that. Ducking? This woman felt her place was not to talk to her husband when she had problems, but merely to pray. My face just about fell off when I heard that, and so when I mention the status of women as being important, this is why. (For some of you more liberated folks)


The other problem is that too many churches are using the Old Testament to back up their ideas about women. What they don't know is that in the torah, women had more rights than they actually had in Jesus' time. When I say Jesus was a feminist, I'm not being funny. He was. We must interpret Paul through Jesus, and understand that the things Jesus did were completely outrageous. (Receiving support from women for his ministry, talking to the woman at the well, healing the women who touched him) Completely! The OT is continually misrepresented by self-serving men and women who are afraid to take control of their own lives. Forgive me if that sounds harsh, but the Bible isn't always easy. (For those who would like more of a breakdown, send me enough comments/emails and I will write about it)


iv. The dating world is ridiculous. My gender is disgusting and rude, and too many women are going after jerks, thereby rewarding these jerks for their behaviour. There have been moments these past six months where I've sorely wished that I had the gift of singleness, that I didn't want a family, but I do, and so I have become witness to an unbelievable amount of ego and vulnerability and stupidity and meanness. The absurdity of humanity is manifested in the dating world, let me tell you. For those of you who have someone or who are married, STAY THE COURSE! Believe me, you do not want to go back there...


v. The power of "how are you?". Having moved away this past September, I have been both saddened and encouraged by the people who have stayed in touch and those who haven't. They say that all it takes is a move to reveal who your real friends are. And that's true. A number of people never bothered to drop me even a quick email, to see how I was doing, and I can't say it doesn't hurt. It does. But I've been guilty of that in the past as well. I know I've done it. People have moved into new lives and I didn't even think about it. It is amazing, especially when you're in a new environment, what a simple "how are you?" can mean. Our lives are disjointed enough, aren't they? Everywhere we go we see people texting or talking on the phone with one another, and yet the gap of loneliness remains huge. This Christmas, I encourage you to send out five cards or emails to people you haven't talked to in a while, and simply ask how they're doing. I think you'll be surprised how much it means.


Blessings,


Steve

4 comments:

  1. hi Steve, I'm star from SCN. you just sent me a message and I thought I would check out your website and i kind of got glued to it. I however have to mention that the setting for sending or writing emails is in italian and i had to sign up and get a blogger account before sending you a comment and that took a while for me to figure out since my italian is not that brilliant yet. I am not on myspace but on facebook. you can look for my profile if you're on facebook too. otherwise my email address is stellatushtu@yahoo.com. God bless you for not only having an inspiring, encouraging and uplifting blog, but for also being soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo transparent, goodness!!! Ciao Stella.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Steve,
    Jesus was Jesus, and He was an advocate for looking at people for what they were in their heart as opposed to life station or exterior traits.

    You do much the same thing as people who leverage scripture selectively to support their opinions to try and legitimize their beliefs when you slap crass labels on Jesus like feminist.

    There is so little agreement or unity on what feminism is, even within the feminist community, and most women who ascribe to a notion of equality (as in suffrage and essential rights) don't even qualify as feminists to most within the milieu.

    Jesus is not John Lennon- a political activist who wasn't about isms but established his own in decrying others.

    I realize that your effort is to engage people in seeing more than the blond haired, blue eyed stereotype, and that I couldn't agree with more. I just think that you don't achieve that goal by applying new or inaccurate labels to Jesus to nullify old labels that don't fit either..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Stella,

    Thanks for the kind words. I've consistently echoed my own belief on this site that if we want the church to be more transparent, we must be more transparent. We all struggle and wrestle with the same things at different times. the essence of community is understanding that, and it one of the vital ways that God gives us hope.

    Steve

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for your comments t-man. And thanks for your kind words. One day we'll truly understand that Jesus was a Jew, but until then...

    I appreciate your understanding that calling Him a feminist is a crass label, perhaps it is, but in the context of the "complimentarian debate" (That is, there are whole ddenominations who exist and believe that women are second class, are not allowed leadership roles, and are treated as though Paul's words to be silent can be applied whenever the "religious" male chooses.) it is necessary to send a shot across the bow. Yes, you're moderate, Teacherman, I appreciate that, so this idea of a woman being less than a male probably doesn't exist for you, but moderated debate only takes you so far.
    The idea is not to label Jesus, but to point to the extremes to which he went to, as you say, seeing where people "were in their heart". In the evangelical church, this idea of Jesus looking at people's hearts is an abstract thought. Example, I was taught not to go to bars or drink alcohol. (Told that real Christians don't "do that." Huh? When I went for my degree in theology, my undergrad, my school forbid it.

    How does that fit with the pattern of Jesus, who was considered a wine bibber and a drunkard? We couch our language too much, I think, so that the real, earthy Jesus no longer exists.
    As to the notion of feminnism, I find it a disturbing field myself. However, the real outrage is that women were not allowed to vote in Canada until 1917 (in Quebec it was 1940!!) and in the US it was 1920. We say "yeah, yeah" and brush it off, but can you imagine what it was like to be a woman? In Palestine, 2000 years ago, it was far worse. I won't go into the details. My point is that Jesus was an advocate for the misrepresented, not just individually, but in larger social dynamics as well. This idea of "God and me" or "Jesus and me" is a relatively new one, and fits with the individualistic market that has developed over the past century and a half.
    So long as churches will deny women their basic rights to humanity I will call Jesus a feminist, because its the only term they understand. And if it is crass, so be it. If they think that I'm limiting Jesus somehow, by adopting a controversial label to make a point, than they can't possibly believe He is God, and that if He is, He's mighty small.

    As for Jesus being an activist, of course He was. He was more than that, but He wasn't as interested in the separation of church and state as we are. He advocated for both groups and individuals. Again, this idea of God and me is born of our culture, certainly not His.

    blessings

    Steve

    ReplyDelete